An international saffron stock should be established was the proposal made by Seyyed Hashem Naghibi at a Mashhad saffron-market round table in 2019. Iran already produced most of the world’s saffron, he argued, so it should not stop at a domestic trading platform. It should build a market that foreign buyers could use.

Saffron producer, quality specialist and international buyer reviewing a sealed lot
An international benchmark begins with a physical saffron lot that every participant can verify.

The ambition was understandable. An international commodity exchange, however, is not created by production share alone. It needs a contract international buyers trust, reliable delivery and grading, regulated clearing, workable payments, transparent prices and enough participants to keep the market liquid.

The Khorasan Razavi production case

Naghibi was Director of Horticultural Affairs at the Khorasan Razavi Agricultural Jihad Organization. Speaking beside Mashhad’s Stock Exchange, Banking, Insurance and Economic Exhibition at the Mashhad International Exhibition Center, he described the province as Iran’s leading saffron region.

The old translation says Khorasan Razavi had only 86 hectares of saffron while producing 300–310 tonnes. Those numbers cannot describe the same commercial crop. The missing unit is almost certainly “thousand.” Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture statistics reproduced in FAO/Codex material recorded 69,407 hectares in the province in 2014–15, before the several years of expansion described in this report. Because the original 2019 table is not attached, 86,000 should still be read as a corrected historical statement rather than a current area figure.

Naghibi said cultivation had been expanding by roughly 2,000–2,500 hectares a year, with faster growth in some recent seasons. He also said that weak sales and an incomplete market chain had begun to slow that expansion.

Why saffron expanded in a dry province

The translation calls saffron a “low-fat product,” which makes no agricultural sense. The intended point was low water demand relative to many competing crops. As Khorasan Razavi became drier and water-intensive cropping came under pressure, saffron’s autumn flowering cycle and regional experience made it an attractive alternative.

That advantage should not be simplified into “saffron needs no water.” Establishment, corm growth, flowering and next season’s yield still depend on soil, irrigation timing, temperature and field management. Naghibi’s broader policy was therefore to improve yield and quality rather than expand land without limit.

Production leadership does not automatically create price leadership

A large producer can still accept prices discovered elsewhere if its crop is sold in fragmented lots, exported in bulk, or traded through buyers with stronger market information. A credible Iranian reference price would need to represent real, deliverable saffron of a defined grade and to be accessible to the businesses that buy and sell it.

The 2019 report claims that any country controlling more than 60% of a commodity can establish an international exchange. No recognised exchange or regulatory rule supporting that threshold is identified. Market share can make a contract commercially relevant, but it does not grant international status.

Other producers also matter. Naghibi named Afghanistan, China, Uzbekistan, Greece and Morocco as countries entering or expanding in saffron. Spain is another important producer, processor and trading centre. Iran’s response should be better quality, traceability and market access, not the assumption that rivals cannot develop the crop. As he noted, plants move beyond their original regions; Iran itself now grows crops such as kiwifruit, maize and potatoes that originated elsewhere.

What an international saffron contract would require

IOSCO’s commodity-derivatives principles start with the physical market. A contract used for hedging and price discovery must reflect how the underlying commodity is actually graded, stored and delivered. Terms that favour one side or do not match commercial practice can prevent cash and futures prices from converging.

For saffron, the essential design work includes:

  • a deliverable grade based on objective colour, aroma, flavour, moisture, contamination and authenticity criteria;
  • approved laboratories, sampling rules and a procedure for resolving disputed tests;
  • licensed warehouses with sealed lot identity, storage conditions, insurance and enforceable delivery rights;
  • contract size, delivery months and locations that fit the real harvest and export market;
  • central clearing, margin rules, position monitoring and safeguards against manipulation;
  • legal access for foreign participants, usable settlement currencies and reliable cross-border payments;
  • published volume, open interest, stocks and settlement methodology.

A foreign trader will not participate merely because Iran grows the most saffron. The trader needs confidence that the contract can be entered, cleared and exited, and that delivery will match the promised quality.

Mechanisation can support the contract, but it cannot create the market

Naghibi identified post-harvest processing and broader mechanisation as part of the strategy. Suitable equipment can reduce repetitive labour, improve control over drying and packing, and make lot quality more consistent. It can also fail if it bruises flowers, delays stigma separation or is too expensive for small farms.

An exchange benefits from consistency, but the specification should describe the saffron, not force every grower to use one production method. Hand-harvested saffron can meet a standard. Mechanised processing can miss it. Testing and traceability decide whether a lot is deliverable.

The damaged “$8 billion” claim

The old translation says foreign businesses would invest once the saffron market reached “$8 billion.” That value is not credible as a documented 2019 saffron-market total, and the surviving text does not show the original currency or unit. It may have referred to 8,000 billion rials or tomans, exchange turnover, or a projected domestic value.

Without the Persian source and calculation, the number cannot be repaired safely. The useful meaning is narrower: Naghibi believed a market large enough to attract foreign participation should move beyond a local exchange. The unverified dollar value should not be used in investment planning.

A practical path from domestic to international trade

Iran’s domestic infrastructure is the starting point. Approved warehouses and commodity deposit certificates connect a physical lot to a tradable record. Futures and options can add price-risk tools when their contract terms match that stored product. Our explanation of how Iran’s saffron derivative market works sets out those layers and their risks.

International participation would then require compatible quality documents, clear origin records, accessible rules in languages buyers use, enforceable dispute resolution and payments that can actually settle. Published benchmark governance is as important as the trading software.

Naghibi’s proposal remains valuable as a direction: a dominant producer should have a stronger voice in price discovery. The safest route is not to declare a global benchmark, but to earn one trade by trade through a contract that growers, exporters and overseas buyers can all verify.

Sources